Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amy Brunvand's avatar

I think you hit the nail on the head, Nan. Cox seems to think that trump's money (if it ever materializes) will pay for some kind of magic geoengineering solution without respect for the Great Salt Lake ecosystem. With a billion dollars, surely there will be no need to implement water conservation, stop proposed Bear River developments, buy out agricultural water rights, conserve wetlands or do anything else inconvenient. Cox can just throw money at the problem and claim that because he is spending a lot he is doing something to help. I doubt that trump will ever really give Utah the money, but if he does, it's essential for Great Salt Lake activists to insist that it be spent on ecological stewardship, not pie-in-the-sky Republican proposals to keep on sucking Utah dry. You are right that there is a difference between coercion and commitment. Before the Kennicott Copper museum fell into the pit, it had a display that said, "Copper is a gift from nature". Clearly, with all that open-pit mining and blasting away mountains nobody was showing any gratitude for the "gift". The lack of gratitude is a problem.

kim pederson's avatar

reality and inspiration have you sent this to rev j sylvan and the tribune

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?